The hummingbird is a masterpiece of beauty and engineering and it weighs less than a penny.
Transforms in months, not millions of years. One might only wonder how this truly remarkable process takes place, and what makes it possible.
There is absolutely no explanation for this beautiful and remarkable lifeform outside of a creator. The odds of chance and necessity creating it is completely illogical.
Some read scripture looking for reasons to doubt, others reasons to believe. Which one are you?
So all the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years; and he died.
What is light? Light is electromagnetic radiation detected by the human eye. Electromagnetic radiation occurs over a wide range of wavelengths, from gamma rays less than about 1 × 10−11 meter to radio waves measured in meters. Within that spectrum the wavelengths visible to humans occupy a narrow band, from about 700 nanometers (nm; billionths of a meter) for red light down to about 400 nm for violet light. The speed of light in a vacuum is a fundamental constant in physics, the currently accepted value of which is about 186,282 miles per second or 670,615,200 miles per hour. A light year is the distance light travels in a year. It is not a measure of time, but of distance, that is about 5,879,000,000,000 miles. These are some of the characteristics of light, but are not really a definition of what it is.
There is no single answer to the question “What is light?” that satisfies the many contexts in which light is experienced, explored, and exploited. The physicist is interested in the physical properties of light, the artist in an aesthetic appreciation of the visual world. Through the sense of sight, light is a primary tool for perceiving the world and communicating within it. Light from the Sun warms the Earth, drives global weather patterns, and initiates the life-sustaining process of photosynthesis. On the grandest scale, light’s interactions with matter have helped shape the structure of the universe. Indeed, light provides a window on the universe, from cosmological to atomic scales. Almost all of the information about the rest of the universe reaches Earth in the form of electromagnetic radiation. By interpreting that radiation, astronomers can glimpse the earliest epochs of the universe, measure the general expansion of the universe, and determine the chemical composition of stars and the interstellar medium. Just as the invention of the telescope dramatically broadened exploration of the universe, so too the invention of the microscope opened the intricate world of the cell. The analysis of the frequencies of light emitted and absorbed by atoms was a principal impetus for the development of quantum mechanics. Atomic and molecular spectroscopies continue to be primary tools for probing the structure of matter, providing ultrasensitive tests of atomic and molecular models and contributing to studies of fundamental photochemical reactions.
Light transmits spatial and temporal information. This property forms the basis of the fields of optics and optical communications and a myriad of related technologies, both mature and emerging. Technological applications based on the manipulations of light include lasers, holography, and fiber-optic telecommunications systems. But what is light? Is it a particle or a wave? Why is the speed of light so significant to an understanding of the characteristics of the universe? Why does time stop at the speed of light? Perhaps the statement in I John 1:5 God is light is more esoteric than imagined.
Grandma
Australopithecus
Doppelgangers?
This never happened!
Hot Wheels do not evolve into models do not evolve into pedal cars do not evolve into full size cars do not evolve into limousines.
Marbles do not evolve into pearls do not evolve into ball bearings.
Perceptions of progressions may have limited or no correlation to other members similar in design or appearance.
Humans and monkeys are both primates. But humans are not descended from monkeys or any other primate living today. There is absolutely no evidence in the fossil record that this progression ever occurred.
Note the high margin of error in approximating the strength of the four forces. Paradoxically, this only acts to help confirm the hypothesis that the EM, Weak and Gravitational forces are resonances of the strong force. The strength of the gravitational force is estimated at somewhere between ten to the minus 38 through ten to the minus 41 of the strong force. In conclusion, for those scientists and mathematicians that are so inclined, they might evolve or derive an exact parabolic decay in force strength. However, the one below is a rough approximation.
Embryos ... there is absolutely no correlation in their origins. The same holds true for embryonic development, while similar in appearance they are arrived at with a series of different techniques. According to the above depictions of embryos humans have much more in common with fish than other species of life. Perhaps some Darwinists believe that we are not direct descendants of monkeys or lemurs, but fish. Everything about theories of evolution from one common ancestor are definitely 'fishy'.
Organisms do not naturally select these physical changes; but the ability to change is designed into the organism. Take for example getting a suntan, getting calluses on your hands and feet, working out and getting stronger, or dieting and losing weight. The environment and your behaviors as well as how you react to it and your body reacts to it determine these adaptations. They are not mutations or selected by nature.
Bird beak changes or the addition of muscles, what's the difference?
Then there is the peppered moth ruse.
One can appreciate the zeal, enthusiasm and dedication of these scientists working to confirm Darwinian evolution; but as time passes is becomes obvious that Darwin’s overly simplistic assessment regarding “On the Origin of Species” and “Descent of Man” is seriously flawed. Today so much effort has been invested into accepting Darwinism that its momentum tends to override objective thought and scientific scrutiny. However, now the unilateral belief in Darwinism being based on scientific principles is supplanted with the reality of scientific fact. These massive and incredible generalizations based on fragments such as a tooth or an arm or leg bone are insufficient to draw conclusive species differentiation. These remaining bone fragments re-create only a tiny fraction of the picture paleo archeologists are hoping to reveal. These fragments have given rise to numerous off shoot theories about the origin and descent of man. But still, not even one trace, one bone or one fossil of a missing link between apes and man has ever been discovered. The conclusion being that there is no missing link to be discovered.
"Piltdown Man Hoax Is Exposed," announced the New York Times on November 21, 1953. "Part of the skull of the Piltdown man, one of the most famous fossil skulls in the world, has been declared a hoax by authorities at the British Natural History Museum". The Piltdown fossils, including a portion of the skull, a jawbone, and a few teeth, were found in 1911 and 1912. This "Piltdown Man" was believed by many to be "the earliest Englishman," and in fact, the missing link between apes and humans. But in 1953, the jawbone was found to be that of a modern ape -- orangutan, most likely -- that had been treated with chemicals to make it look as though it had been lying in the ground for hundreds of centuries. The cap of the skull was still thought to be a genuine fossil, but far more recent than originally believed. "This declaration . . . has been made after twenty years of rumors and uneasy speculation among European paleontologists about the authenticity of the bones," the New York Times stated. The London Star headlines shouted, "The Biggest Scientific Hoax of the Century!"
There is a Grandeur in this view of life with its several powers. Having been originally breathed by the creator into a few forms or one... Charles Darwin
Charles Darwin was obviously trying to figure out how the creator made it all happen, not to present an atheistic view of creationism. How the concept of a missing link and creation (without a creator) came about might appear as a complete mystery to Darwin. If Charles Darwin were alive today he would likely be appalled that his theory is being used to present a view of creation without a creator. He definitely made many mistakes and presented many misconceptions. However, modern scientific evolutionary opinions are more at odds with what Darwin was trying to accomplish, than do they confirm anything. Therefore, Darwin's "On the Origin of Species" and "Descent of Man" from this point forward are to be labeled as "Science Fiction", not "Science Fact", his theory has been adequately debunked. All educational institutions are now instructed to stop presenting the theory of Darwinian evolution as a scientific theory.
I'm sorry about the Apple. I should have listened, but I didn't, So don't you be deceived by the power of evolution, as I am a product of the creator, just like you.
Joshua 10 Verses 11 to 14 - And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies... So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day.
What could have happened here is that a massive gravity wave or a large celestial object like a black hole came close to the Earth at an extremely high rate of speed. It's gravity could have caused a temporal anomaly for less than a nano-second. Perhaps it also appeared to stop the tides, the wind, etc. If that happened it would have affected the perception of time for inhabitants on Earth. This infinitesimal temporal anomaly may have appeared to last for a day to inhabitants on Earth. However, there would be no way to accurately measure time during this event. Remember whenever the motion within a frame of reference slows, time rate passage increases. When it passed, conservation of momentum would have restored things to before. Even the slightest aberration in the rate of time passage would appear overwhelming to Earth inhabitants. "Relative and Collapsing Time Theory" would act to support that this event is scientifically possible.
Jonah 1:17 Now the Lord had prepared a great fish to swallow up Jonah. And Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights.
Did you know that the tongue of a blue whale is so large that 50 people could stand on it, or that the mouth of a blue whale is so large that it could hold 100 people. Therefore, a blue whale could easily swallow a man with enough air for him to live for three days.
Genesis 1:21 - And God created the great whales...
Matthew 12:40 - For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
Australopithecus
The Higgs Boson - The God Particle
The "missing link" is an invented hypothetical extinct creature halfway in the evolutionary line between modern human beings and their anthropoid progenitors. In the latter half of the 19th century, a common misinterpretation of Charles Darwin’s work was that humans were lineally descended from existing species of apes.
Missing Link?
Since the theory of Darwinian evolution has now been proven to be scientifically and mathematically invalid how should the scientific community broach the topic. Anticipating that there will be exceptional and enduring pushback against the Theory of Creative Evolution, remember the comment about ethics and the responsibility of science to relinquish the dogmas of Darwinism to a more significant, accurate and empirically driven theory. Everyone will now get to witness the chaotic characteristics of scientific discovery. The metaphorical "monkey wrench" thrown into the mix with these assessments will allow the scientific community to grow beyond both Darwin and Einstein. And that definitely needs to happen as it better serves both humanity and science. In short, it restores both the credibility of the scientific method and also the value of religious ideology. While not meant to support any specific religious ideology, the "six days" of creation in relative time seems more plausible than the monkey to man idea. When applying the scientific method evolution now appears to be both far fetched and a fringe point of view. That is because there is absolutely no evidence in the fossil record that it ever happened. But, perhaps, these things did. You decide.
This never happened!
Jeremiah 33:3 - Call unto me, and I will answer thee, and shew thee great and mighty things, which thou knowest not. 3 Call to me and I will answer you, and will tell you great and hidden things that you have not known. 3 Ask me and I will tell you remarkable secrets you do not know about things to come.
"Give it a try. I did. This theory is a small glimpse of what He told me."
No. The rate of passage of time is due to the composite motion in the universe and the composite gravity in the universe acting upon an observer based on their proximity within the universe.
The consequences of there being “time no longer” is impossible to accurately determine..